American Logging Monopolizing the Industry

The Australian government has been accused of misleading the UN in its bid to strip the World Heritage Protection from the Tasmanian Forest. The UN wanted the area for logging so when Australia was asked about the land, they said that it was unsuitable to be logged because to much had already been taken and because it would disturb the ecosystem. In reality, the forrest was in extremely good shape and considered "ecologically pristine".

The way the Guardian spook about the issue seemed very negative towards Australia. The guardian specifically showed the hypocrisy of Australia by "releasing pictures of ecologically pristine areas" in Australia. The Guardian seemed to be shaming Australia for trying to maintain their forrest by calling out their lies. I think that Australia has a right to keep the land, and not let the UN, who is deeply enforced by the US, deforest it.

Today, our world is dealing with major issues of the environment. While there are many problems to name, deforestation is a major concern. Deforestation is raising carbon monoxide levels which in turn are destroying our atmosphere. Also deforestation is ruining ecosystems and causing animal species to become extinct. This problem doesn't seem to be ending, but only growing.

According to a blog by National Geographic, Forests currently take up 30% of the land on earth. But every year forests the size of Panama are being torn down and destroyed. At the current rate, there will not be a single rainforest on the planet in one hundred years. Forests have been deforested for many reasons, and there are many people or companies behind the reasons.

In countries all over south america, american companies have exploited cheap labor or corrupted governments to get at the logging, or oil underneath the land. While oil is a whole other issue, much of the forests in South America have been torn down for the purpose of oil. According to the World Bank, 80% of Peru's logging is illegal. And most of the wood that is logged there ends up in american products, giving the US about $72 million in profit from timber smugglers.

In 1994, an agreement was reached between a logging company from Asia, with ties to american corporations, and Suriname that granted the company 25% of Suriname's land, 7.5 million acres, and valued each acre at less than $35. The unfair deal was created because Suriname was in need of financial aid but this deal ultimately gave them $2 million while the US received $28 million annually.

Coming back to Australia, I believe that they have a right to keep their forest. While under developed countries can't hold the US off of their materials, I think countries like Australia should keep their own products for themselves. Do you agree? What else has america monopolized like the logging industry? Does Australia keeping their forest really affect the US and their industry?